Find a Lawyer

JAVAID IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LAHORE

Article 18 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Jurisdiction to Investigate Constitutional Request Jurisdictional Board on the request of the complainant, for the first time recommended a case for change in the investigation, but the Additional Inspector General of Police recommends Disagreeing and on the complainant's second request for a change in the first inquiry, the Standing Board did not recommend a case for change in the investigation, but the Additional Inspector General of Police did not agree to this recommendation again and revised its first order. After inspecting the change confirmed the Additional Inspector General of Police, though, the police Under Article 18 (6) of the Fear 2002, he was obliged to consider and make recommendations by the board constituted under the said section, but after considering his profession and superiority, he could not, however, disagree with the recommendation. However, the Additional Inspector General of Police did not have the authority to review his earlier order. The High Court noted with great concern that if such action was allowed, the orders of the Additional Inspector General of Police would have no final restriction and would be finalized. Time for inquiry transfer procedures will be a disappointment, even under the provisions of the Police Order, 2002, the Additional Inspector General of Police did not have the authority to review his previous order, the right to review was sufficiently accurate and Was always the creation of the relevant. Law courts were not obliged to disagree with the police's opinion on the matter, so on the basis of such police opinion, the accused would not be entitled to any relief, after recording the complainant's statement, Paul property advocate from Jamshoro lawyer