Find a Lawyer

DR. MAHMUD ASGHAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 25 (c), 12 (18), 63 and 156 Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), section 2 (3) to include amounts recovered in connection with deductions, etc. On the basis of which the complainant / reviewer did not object to the proposed behavior and notice issued under section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the complainant / reviewer claimed that there was no liability for the due trade, But if there is nothing in the loans, they can be considered under the provisions of Section 12. 18) Most of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was borrowed from previous years. In the justification documents it was stated that the Complainant / Reviewer's claim was valid and was made under Section 25 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. It was illegal. And the refusal of the assessee to disclose damages without assigning any cause under section 25 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, without giving any reason, from the correction of ted loans and original orders. All denials and laws were against the rules and regulations. Both the reservation orders for the assessment year 1998 99 and 2001 2002, depending on the facts of the case pakistani advocates Narowal lawyer