versus
Sections 17B, 25 and 16 (3) Wealth Tax Rules, 1963, R8 (2) (C) (ii) Assistant Commissioner's Notice of Review of the Order of the Wealth Tax Officer Service of Service Facts Do not mention it to any reviewer or its representative who has clearly indicated that nothing has been reported on the matter. In the absence of proper service of notice, the Ising Authority cannot be given jurisdiction to decide the case. The original order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax was merged with the order passed under section 25 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, whereby the Wealth Tax Commissioner in his amending jurisdiction stated that the original order also The assessing officer made the correction. Subsequent to the amending order as well as the amended order, the original order passed under section 16 (3) of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 will not be entitled and shall also include section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act 1963. Can't be done. In terms of the accuracy of the review, there was virtually no order to stop this field because the original order was later amended as well as contained in a revision order approved under section 25 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, and no The notice was not submitted. To initiate any proceedings under the law order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Inspection under Section 17B of Financial Tax A, which was the Reviewing Plan. ct, was vacated by the Appellate Tribunal in 1963 and the original order was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Mohmand lawyer