Find a Lawyer

MUNIR HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 80C and 50 (4) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Sections 122A and 153 (9) of the CBR Circular No. 6, Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of 2003 (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) (CBR Circular No. 6 of 2003) An order for cancellation of this assessment under section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, presented as a Tax Washerman / Dhobi Determination Officer on the income of some contractors and importers. Was adopted, which was the final liability tax deducted under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The Assisi claimed that the services rendered as washmen / dhobi were covered by the word "word services" and that the studies were not justified under section 80C of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The matter came under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and the deduction of tax deductions in the pre-tax regime and the deduction of taxes could not be finalized, the matter was dealt with at length by the Appellate Tribunal. Went and was held. The services rendered by the appellate tribunal, whether by contract or otherwise, were not covered by the Income Tax Ordinance, the umpteous tax regime covered by ump `1979 1979 1979 \ Services \ The Federal Tax Ombudsman That the affected persons should be placed on the side of the Commissioner of Income Tax and that the taxation officer should, after issuing a notice under section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, review the complainant's returns under common law. \ r \ n tax advocates from Kech lawyer