Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SALAM JATOI versus ANWAR HUSSAIN

Sections 12 (2) and AXXIII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 12, 39, 42 and 53 Sect 12 (2) for specific performance, declaration, document revocation, injunction and damages ), The CPC alleges that the decree was obtained through respondents' misrepresentation and fraud because the applicant threatened to obtain his signature on the compromise request. Was inserted, e.g., the decree of consent was not free and it was bound that under section 12 (2), the date of the approval of the decree of the consent of the CPC Filed after one year and ten months, if there was any misrepresentation by the defendant or any fraud, it was not disclosed what the circumstances were for which they would remain silent. The application was completely silent for so long from the date of approval of the decree that it was completely silent to show how the respondents had used the influence which forced them to sign the contract. For the purpose of considering the application under Section 12 (2), the CPC, the applicant was required to present every detail of each and every allegation which was filed in their Abq was necessary to decide the issue of the consent decree, but they failed to do so female advocates from Miran Shah lawyer