Find a Lawyer

FAHAD MALIK versus MIR MUMTAZ HUSSAIN JAKHRANI

Sections 12 (2) (f) and 14 of the General Election Order (7 of 2002), Article 8 (d) (1) (g) of ineligible property details and land revenue amount papers The objections raised by the appellant were rejected by the Returning Officer, giving money and not mentioning the land owned by him. The law requires that under section 12 (2) (f) of the Public Representation Act, 1976, the candidate must present his assets and liabilities and statements of his spouse and dependents, which are filed 30 days before the law Were on the prescribed form and did not provide that the property should be accurately measured and did not suggest that the candidate was disqualified. In order to contest the election, if it has some areas, it can be a major mistake by the candidate and it can be represented under Section 14 (3) (d) (ii) of the representation of the people. The Act of 1976 provided no limit to the payment of land revenue to contest the election; any error or omission in the payment of land revenue was not equivalent to concealing material details which could be ineligible for property. The difference between mentioning and payment of details of land revenue and filing of false information in nomination was nothing to do with false / incorrect statements in the material details. The nomination papers were correctly accepted by the Returning Officer. There was no illegality or weakness in the order according to which the appeal was dismissed. jobs for fresh advocates from Sibi lawyer