Find a Lawyer

IMDAD ALI versus STATE

Sections 320, 279, 337G, 337F (vi) and 337F (i) occurred when the accused was driving an oil tanker in a hurry and negligence and collided with a jeep in which the complainant, the deceased. And the other traveling co-accused, who was the owner of the oil tanker in question, was neither present nor participated in the incident at any time of the incident. The related responsibility was imposed on the accused who operated the oil tanker and who was the co-accused, the owner of the oil tanker, cannot be held responsible or carried out by the driver of his vehicle. The outgoing liability can be held liable. The driver of the accident was at risk and responsibility and was responsible for the entire incident. The court convicted the joint accused without owning an oil tanker and hearing the broad principles of natural justice in his absence for payment of compensation and compensation. Violations were made because no one should be condemned before a negative order was approved against them. The order against the co-accused / owner of the oil tanker was approved, illegal, unlawful, unfair and the defendant was convicted and sentenced to be punished for violating the principles of natural justice. The trial court did not convict the accused for the amount of Rs. 2,80,000 in five years' RI and DATA compensation and Rs. 10,000 compensation and legal compensation of the injured persons. Section 320 was also a prerequisite; PPC had an effective ruling. The matter was referred to the trial court for judgment in accordance with law. lawer from fb area from Bunner lawyer