KARIM ENTERPRISES, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 (16), 3, 16, 17 and 25 establish the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), S, S and 9 and 11 assessments in relation to the property, but all of the authority The lease is like a plow. Was such property valid for at least the tenancy period? There was no reference in the valid lease deed to prove that the complainant was the owner of the land or superstructure until the property was established, the property or the super-construction cannot be said to belong to the complainant. Contrary to the law, rules and regulations did not invalidate such action, and for good reason the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended to the Commissioner to set aside the invalid assessment. Inquire whether the complainant has added / amended it after obtaining the lease or, fresh constructions have been taken which can be said to belong to it and then based on the results of the investigation Creates a frame
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
