Find a Lawyer

AL-ABBAS TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 221, 122A & 122 (5A) of Income Tax Ordinance (XXXX of 1979), Sections 156, 80C and 50 (4) of the CBR Circular No. 111, Office of 30 1991 of 1991, Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Establishment (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) and 10 (8) Income from the Error Correction Commission; Income Tax Ordinance 1979 on Employment Services and Support Services under Section 62/132 of the Information Ordinance 1979 After direct inquiry, the demanded \ nnil \ demand notes were issued so that correction was requested for full credit approval and a request for a refund was filed under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. It was recommended to take action because the complainant / reviewer was a contractor and he was admitted to the Prismatic Tax Regime, however, the Assessing Officer admitted that the error was evident from the record but denied that correction. The case was proposed for action under Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which was against the President's decision to reject the reform petition for the creation of a return. The Federal Tax Ombudsman was not sustained in the view of the law in Rico's opinion that the tax revenue officer approved the complainant's request under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, approved under section 2121 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Provision of Section 122A of the Income Tax shall be exempted by exception. Ordinance, 2001 and review year 1998 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 02 and 2002 03 The result of the review order should be that the complainant's refund be properly settled and the additional payment should be issued alongwith If so, the law law firms from Washuk lawyer