Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAYAT ULLAH KHAN versus STATE


Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 148, 149 and 34, approval of further inquiry is against Ocular Account Medical Evidence, the co-accused, who testified to the alleged injury. Was also injured, found innocent. During the interrogation and the police did not arrest him, firearms were recovered from the investigating suspects, but no blank was recovered from the scene by the agency, no evidence, was present to set the record under the circumstances. That the weapon was ever used at that time. Prima facie said the facts under the allegations of the inquiry were sufficient so that the inquiry could be conducted and they would be granted bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Mangowal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.