HAYAT ULLAH KHAN versus STATE
Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 148, 149 and 34, approval of further inquiry is against Ocular Account Medical Evidence, the co-accused, who testified to the alleged injury. Was also injured, found innocent. During the interrogation and the police did not arrest him, firearms were recovered from the investigating suspects, but no blank was recovered from the scene by the agency, no evidence, was present to set the record under the circumstances. That the weapon was ever used at that time. Prima facie said the facts under the allegations of the inquiry were sufficient so that the inquiry could be conducted and they would be granted bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bhimbar lawyer
