Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus FARRUKH CORPORATION THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

A. VIII, R2L Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 High Court Appeal Money Suite's Recovery Joint Evidence Suite was filed by the plaintiff bank against its borrower and warehouse owner The borrower's stock borrower was determined and the bank auctioned the borrower's stock. The bank's complaint was that the owner of the warehouse failed to provide the entire stock to him, therefore, the bank suffered a loss that was attempted to jointly recover the warehouse owner as well as the lender. The trial court ruled in favor of the bank against the borrower, only that it was raised by the bank that both defendants were jointly responsible for the bank's loss, therefore, both The trial court should not have decided jointly against the accused. Review the evidence in its original context and incorrectly find that the agreement between the plaintiff bank and the owner of the warehouse had no privacy, the significance of the agreement between the plaintiff bank and the warehouse owner, the owner had to specify the stock in his warehouse. The obligation to keep the quantity and the way it was kept in the bank at his warehouse or to repay it cannot be denied. If the nominee has suffered any reduction, the owner of the warehouse was responsible for such reduction and was responsible for paying the losses and damages caused by his stock in the warehouse, to the warehouse owner. Cannot be released in the event of any loss or damage. The owner of the stock held in your warehouse is not responsible for the negligence of Godown's stock. female advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer