Find a Lawyer

NASIR NAWAB KHAN versus MST. KAUSAR NAZ

Section,, & & os was alleged by the Complainant of Illegal Settlement, in his absence, his flat was illegally occupied by the accused / applicants, under the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005 Filed in the trial court, the trial court took notice of the case, granted a warrant warrant arrest against the non-issuing applicants and further ordered that the complainant be kept in possession of the flat. The lawyer's complaint for the applicants was that in this case the complainant should take up the matter of occupying the flat and it was subsequently approved without providing his opportunity. It is being heard that the accepted position was that the order to put the complainant in question was passed without any opportunity which can be heard by the applicants. No one can be heard because in the present case the applicants have a flat. Occupied so they had the right. Appeal to be heard by the trial court and then a proper order should be passed in the court. An order was taken to seize the applicants from the applicants without hearing the applicants and keep the complainant in the flat. That part of the order was retained. Was not ordered by the High Court with the direction that the trial court should hear the case before passing it. The order should provide applicants with a hearing best advocate from Matli lawyer