Find a Lawyer

ALI ASGHAR versus MAZHAR ASIM

Sections 417 (2), 247, 249 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 163, 167 and 408 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the respondents / accused Appeals against those under which they have been acquitted. Section 249A, CRPC, filed an appeal against such a breach by complaint. The CRPC trial court had charged the accused persons for failing to appear in the court for the CCP's plea for acquittal of the accused. On some occasions the diaries of the case and other evidence on record show that after filing a direct complaint and the prosecution's witnesses appeared in court on different dates of the hearing, the complainant and the prosecution witnesses heard Of the 46 total hearings from the hearing, 44 appeared in court. Thereafter the complainant and the prosecution witnesses were present, but the case was adjourned at the request of the accused. The complainant wanted to pursue the case and returned to the High Court twice before the complainant's chief. Was made and subsequently the complainant was present with a witness on several occasions, but the matter was postponed to the point that the complainant had not brought all his testimony, if, at the trial, the court found that the case Being unnecessarily postponed, then in addition to the complainant's evidence, it was said that a witness Should also be recorded, the trial court ultimately acquitted the accused under Section 249A, CRPC, for non-presentation of the prosecution witnesses. Apart from the facts, the approval of the law was not within the realm of law and justice, however famous supreme court advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer