MAJOR RETD. REHMAT-ULLAH BHUTTA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Section 406, 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), the appeal against the charge of breach of section 417 against the accused was that he was a commission agent and running his business through the showroom. That they had assured the appellant that there was no disruption to the vehicle in the dispute, customs and other duties had already been paid. After being satisfied with the assurance, the appellant sent the accused to his commission. The customs authorities inspected the vehicle, since customs duty was not paid, in fact, attracted the components of fraud, the appellant also recovered the disputed money. Had filed a civil lawsuit against the accused, but the appellant's conduct was not sufficient to pardon her criminal liability. A. On occasion, under the circumstances, the appellant should have been provided to prove his case that the impeachment order approved by the reviewing court was concurrent with the trial of the prosecution at an early stage. Sustainable appeal was allowed and the features presented to the trial court for its decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer