Find a Lawyer

DR. SHAUKAT ILAHI versus CH. MUBASHAR HUSSAIN

Sections 12, 13, 14 (3) (C) and 14 (5A) Representation of the People (Holding of Elections) Rules, 1977, R5 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 62 (F) and 63 (1) (Q) (R) The allegations against the candidates against the nominees for the election were that they were involved in the cooperative scandal and they were guaranteed to sign and guarantee the contract for payment of 200 million rupees. Guarantees the implementation of this agreement was not denied by the candidates as per the schedule mentioned in the agreement nor was the letter / certificate issued on the subject issued by the Punjab Cooperative Board for Prosecution. It may be that the matter was resolved as a petition hearing. The agreement guarantees the candidates that the Punjab Cooperative Board for Parasitic Certificate also showed that $ 60 million was outstanding at the time, the candidates filed their nomination papers to pay the guaranteed money. No reference was made to the aforementioned plea agreement nor to the progress of any constitutional petition, though a strong declaration was expected from the candidates under Section 12, Representation Act 1976 and even paragraph 3 of nomination papers. Was gone An attempt was made to suppress and conceal a very material disclosure, which, under the law, was the responsibility of the guarantor / guarantor in accordance with Section 14 (5A) of the Public Representation of the Principal Debtor Returning Officer and the Appellate Tribunal. Act, 1976, rejecting the nomination papers of a candidate who was not in debt, taxes, government liabilities, utility charges, etc. No one should be blamed for its deceptive reasons famous supreme court advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer