MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, the grant of further inquiry the accused sought bail on this basis. The case against him was the result of malpractice and misunderstanding. That he had no explicit action or motive assigned because he was not empty-handed and did not share the common intention and did not cause the deceased to scratch. The complainant, who was the witness of the deceased's husband and witnesses of the incident, has taken an oath that he has no objection to the accused's bail and that the accused was not present at that time and place. And that the accused was behind bars for the last one year without any progress in the trial and the complainant did not seriously object to the approval of the bail on the basis of the request made at the bar and further investigation was completed by the accused. As attracted The intervention case remains on the defendant's bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Dargai lawyer