Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE

Appreciating Section (c) Evidence of the accused's lawyer that the police inspector, who had complained about the matter, could not act as an investigating officer, as there was no law by which a police officer could be prosecuted. At the same time, there was no restriction on a police officer who had been accused of acting as an investigating officer's lawyer for the accused, failing to act as complainant and investigating officer. , It further claimed that only samples were sent from each packet. For, the remaining quantities of marijuana not sent to the Chemical Examiner, could not be treated as the recovered marijuana from the accused, were withdrawn, the whole quantity of the narcotic could not be sent to the chemical inspector. And if the samples sent were enough for the Chemical Examiner's report to be positive, then the entire drug content could be considered as a drug contaminated by the drug, even though they were present at the time of recovery, but no one could be a witness. The accused was not accused of any enmity between himself and the complainant Akh could be involved as a suspect false. The prosecution's witnesses fully supported the arrest of the accused and the recovery of the drugs. The prosecution's witnesses were extensively investigated, but the arrest of the accused and the recovery of large quantities of marijuana from the suspects was not confirmed, nor was there any dispute at the time of his arrest. An independent accused of recovering hashish female advocates from Havelian lawyer