Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KAMRAN BEHAN versus BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

Section 42 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2020 suit for demanding change of plaintiff's name was rejected because it was brought to the hands of the plaintiffs in order to be administered under section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 And according to law; the plaintiff failed to bring his case within the scope of section 42 of the Special Relief Act 1877 as well as Article 120 of the Limitation Act 1908; Without changing his mind and whether the law allowed him to change his name to his name and wish the plaintiff had his influence In order to change his name in primary school using the affidavit, he took appropriate procedures for filing a case for the same plaintiff without any reason, and his case was rightly dismissed by the courts below the appeal. In the circumstances, dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MUNSIF KHAN ADVOCATE v. Mst. KHURSHEED BEGUM 2013 MLD 1032
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias BAJOO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1034
• ABDUL HAKEEM CHANDIO v. State 2013 YLR 1037
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM CHOUDHRY v. AZIZ-UR-REHMAN 2013 CLC 1042
• SHAMSUL HAQUE MAHAR v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1046
• Mrs. HAMIDA ADIL v. SWAMI NARAYAN TEMPLE TRUST, KARACHI 2013 YLR 1049
• MUHAMMAD SULEMAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1051
• NORTHERN POLYTHENE LIMITED (NPL) v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 1053

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

lawer from fb area from Hub Inds Estate lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes