SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
SS: & 46 and service 48 The request for regularization of the service has been appealed to the employees of the High Court to work under different categories under appellant / employers for less than five years without any interruption of record. Are working on a charge basis. Their services, which were denied and referred to the Labor Court, were accepted by the Labor Court, which was seized by the employer through appeals before the High Court's endorsement. No scope was raised to show that the Labor Court was contrary to the facts that the grounds emphasized in the appeal were stereotypical. The government offices maintain a complete record of the employees' employment. That based on the charge of the employees, the employees also made the first part of the proof of employment and the continuation of their services. Excluded and it was for the employees to prove that the employees' claim was falsified by the relevant law identification did not provide any specific example of the law's incorporation of facts and the appeal in the memorandum of appeal. How and what was prejudiced against employers, their appeals were dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kot Radha Kishan lawyer