Find a Lawyer

KASHIF KHAN versus STATE

The application bail for Sections 111A, 44, 249 and 249A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 489A and 489F was confiscated under Sections 249 and 249A, CRPC. An application was filed, before the Judicial Magistrate demanding for his victory. On the basis that the dispute appears to be of a civil nature and the competent case was not filed by a competent person, the trial court did not recognize the evidence presented by the accused's lawyer and dismissed the same accused, dismissing the order. Applied for The appeal filed by the accused under Section 249A / 249, CRPC, was dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate's lawyer, depending on section, Cr, CRPC, that the complainant was not taking advantage of the complaint. , The FIR filed by him was against these provisions in section 44, CRPC, no doubt section 44, CRPC included section 489A, PPC so as to take note by the nearest magistrate or police officer. However, the section 489 APFC in which the alternative was made was entered into by the Ordinance LXV of the PPC and Section 489F, PPC 2002, dated 25 10 2002. After becoming a part and parcel of section 489F, PPC, 5489, PPC, it cannot be said that it was excluded from section 44, CCP Complainant, who was the manager of the respective company, It cannot be said that he is not a competent person. According to Section 489F, PPC for filing an FIR, deliberately issuing bogus checks was considered a criminal offense and otherwise if the party against whom any action was taken and stated that the party He has civil and fu top advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer