Find a Lawyer

MST. ZEENAT TANVIR versus P & T CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

A VII, R 11 and Section 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 42, 54 and 55 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 suit for declaration, possession, mandatory / permanent injunction and justice to justice Applicable Application Rule is the claim for rejection of the plaintiff because of the claim under which the plaintiff had already filed a constitutional application, which was dealt with, the case under section 11 again. Withholding under the rule of the judiciary, there was no dispute of the validation of the CPC, no declaration of ownership of the plots being discussed nor any declaration of ownership was sought by the plaintiff. UST has said that even the parties that existing suite City District Government were different from the petition that the defendant in this case. There was no party to the aforementioned constitutional petition, grounds provided for support of the Judicial Judeta doctrine were not available to the defendant, both proceedings sought a completely different relief and the plaintiff's request for dismissal between the parties was excluded in the circumstances. Was done top advocates from Chishtian lawyer