Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR TAWAKKAL versus STATE

The main allegation against the appellant of the value of the clauses 9 (a) (iii), (ix), (xi), 10, 15 and 32 was that he had opened a trust and banking corporation in Turkey and the bank He had committed fraud. And the misappropriation of the money that the evidence relied on by the prosecution was presented by a prosecutor's witness, a special power of attorney, allegedly called by the appellant, Perusal. It was neither endorsed nor supported in Pakistan, in which the power of attorney was implemented and the Turkish government did not receive the endorsement of the embassy, such as the Pakistan or Turkey government. A document or notification was not submitted to examine whether the Special Power of Attorney was executed. Can be used in Turkey in Pakistan and neither the witnesses of the prosecution mentioned the date when the appellant approached to open the bank nor did he specify the date of arrival in Cyprus, nor the date when the appellant deposited the money. Had not specified the date of opening of the Bank Syed Bank in Turkey, nor should it be registered with the relevant department. Registration documents could not be submitted. To show who was the owner of the bank, the prosecutor did not say that documents were not submitted to establish the ownership of the bank case, otherwise the civil court would continue the civil liability and accordingly the judgment need to. The law and evidence presented before the civil court were, however, merely not guaranteed, the provisions of section 10 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 famous high court advocate from Gujrat lawyer