UMER KHITAB versus KNITWEAR INDUSTRIES
Sections 46 and 47 (3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (e) application of service complaint appeal Appellant was a permanent employee and his services Terminated. Appellant's services were not terminated verbally after the inquiry into the charge sheet and the unlawful absence of duties against him, but on a written order after proper inquiry by the inquiry officer. Was terminated in which the appellant participated in the Inquiry Officer's inquiry against the appellant and after completing all formal proceedings, the appellant was found guilty of the charges against the Labor Court, appellant's complaint in the circumstances. 'S request was rightly rejected. In that case, there was no justification for interference with the Labor Court-approved order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Sikandarabad lawyer