MALKA versus SULTAN
Implementation of section 48 and AXXI, Rr 10 and 11 demarcation act (IX of 1908), section 12 (2) and Article 181 order, banned after 3 years, 4 months and 22 days after passing the order The request for an application filed was not one of the requests appearing in section 12 (2) of the 1908 limitation of the time spent in obtaining a certified copy of the decree sought for processing, the order Was not entitled to be excluded from time to time, so the first enforcement application used would be governed by Ocean Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, while subsequent requests were made under section 48, C.P. Shall be governed by C under which a term of six (6) years has been fixed, if the application for execution was not filed within the period prescribed by Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, then the first The application will be withheld from time to time after the expiration of the three ()) application period, and in this case, the Registrar cannot take advantage of the extension period provided by the Securities. On 48, the CPC Execution Request was dismissed when time was barred by the Rules
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer