Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Section 156 (1) (8), 157 (2), 158, 159, 171, 180 and 194 Appeal for the seizure of goods was not pursuant to the provisions of section 159 of the Customs Act 1969 in the present case. The suspects were not presented to the Gazette Officer of Customs or the Adjudicating Officer had also admitted this aspect of the Magistrate's easement to the Adjudicating Officer's observation in an invalid order that it was a procedural error, not fatal, not correct. That, when the law provided for the procedure, the enforcement of the law provided under the law was always considered fatal, the violation of the provisions of section 159 of the Customs Act, 1969, illegal and unlawful. Further action will be taken under this. In this case the confessional order of confiscation, in the circumstances, was set aside

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.