BASHIR AHMAD REHMANI versus PAKISTAN RAILWAY HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
Section 1 (4) (a) (b), 46 and 47 (3) Return of the Complaint Request for Lack of Jurisdiction The Appeal Counsel had suspended the Labor Court's order, whereby the application for his complaint The entertainment was reverted due to lack of jurisdiction. , With the observation that the appellant could resolve it, if according to the two reports available in accordance with the Ministry of Railways, all railway lines were included in the rating of the Ministry of Defense lines, thus all the railways of Pakistan Railway. Employees were not excluded to waive this jurisdiction. The Labor Court Appellant was also ruled under the legal principles of Pakistan Railway despite its former employer, only the Federal Service Tribunal Labor Court's jurisdiction was requested for the appellant, in the circumstances it was right. That the jurisdiction should not be invoked as a former employee of the appellant. Pakistan was a civil servant, attached to the railway and defense lines, and the only treatment for them was to request the jurisdiction of Federal SK. rvice Tribunal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Attock lawyer