Find a Lawyer

ATTO ALIAS ATTA MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/395/396/397/353/332/333/307/404/412/147/148/149 Property Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979) Section 17 (4) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-Xin of 1965), Section 13 (d) Bail, Delay Grant Demand for fourteen years in detention without trial, which was too long by court through law ? It was ordered that the case be terminated within a few days, there was nothing related to the abuse of the law process as well as the judicial delay in the case, especially as it equates to abusing the law or the court process. It was always recognized as a groundwater. The trial of the accused for the grant of bail also violated the fundamental right of access to justice by a tremendous delay and delay of 14 years, which, after being released on bail, treated it without further harm. Should go but it cannot be denied. On the basis that it was alleged that he was found guilty under section 13 (d) during his imprisonment) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, or that he was arrested before his 14 years imprisonment. Was convicted and escaped from police custody; he was not declared a dangerous and hopeless offender in his escape and re-arrest. Delays in this case were shocking, and exceptions to the bail approval for reasons for being a former offender or a dangerous, frustrated, or hardened criminal, would not apply to such shocking delay cases when the accused was granted bail in the circumstances. Was. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bhirya Road lawyer