Find a Lawyer

FAUZIA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Section 10 Sales Tax Rules, 2005, R 29 Sales Tax Rules, 2606, R 39 (4) CBR Letter C No. 2 (1) Federal Tax Ombudsman in STSL & P / 2000 (Pt) Dated 25 11 2006 Establishment of the Office of Ordinance (XXXV 2000), Section 2 (3) Input Tax Return, 2005 Refund Claim was not processed on the basis that the claim for a refund claim. The preparation software (ACT \ S) was not filed as required by the refund rules and regulations. The Sales Tax Rules, 2005, did not require any RCPS (though data must be submitted in electronic format) nor was there any time limit set for filing supporting documents which The purpose was to allow for a period. Six months after the date of declaration of Sales Tax Rules, 2006 for submission of relevant documents, but this letter was issued on 25 11 2006 and it was required to submit all documents by 31 12 2006, but only one The time of the month was given to comply with taxpayers that were not reasonable and disproportionate, with no evidence brought on record to prove that most taxpayers failed to make such a general amnesty trip. Because the matter was not known to them, the Federal Tax Ombudsman suggested that the Federal Board of Revenue withdraw the identification letter. 14 7 2007 addressed the complainant and instructed the relevant collector to obtain the relevant supporting documents from the complainant and then take action and within 60 days of receipt of this order, the law was resolved in accordance with the law and According to the forms of this case after providing appropriate compensation. Listen to the complainant property advocates from Machi Goth lawyer