LION BOX FACTORY, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 2 (3) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) against the factory, sections 14 and 26 (5) a complaint against the factory which was filed two years ago as a manufacturer in the sales tax department. Was filed under which the department canceled the factory along with its letter In the 2004 budget measures of 2004, as per CBR directive, during 2004 to 2004, the factory had less than Rs 50 million on this basis. The former was in effect, but there was no unilateral report of the complainant's unit. For this, he was given the Complainant's Unit, which is a registered unit and regularly submits monthly sales tax declarations and submits invoices summaries under Section 26 (5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. That it is ongoing to be a registered unit was clearly a matter of corruption by the current department because the complainant at all times thought that it was a registered unit and was constituted to stay, but the department did not There was also no proper action at a time when the business had become too much. It was also a malicious act that the unit was unregistered under the CBR order, but the complainant was not notified, though it would have published the news in a special newspaper as the Ombudsman said The CBR should restore the complaining factory registration and ensure that the relevant departments will be able to attend the hearing with restraint and be informed of compliance with the order within fifty days. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Jatoi lawyer