Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FAREED versus MUHAMMAD MANSHA

Section 324, 336, 337 (i) (v) and 285/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 227 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Petition to Increase Crime Including Medical Five witnesses were tried on trial and the offenses under Sections 242424 and 6336, PPC, were fully prepared by their testimony, the applicant submitted a plea of further charges against him. And accordingly, the application for the offense against the accused was allowed under section 666, but it was denied to the extent of the offense under section 242424, both PPC applicants. Responder, and a rethinking of the separate criminal before the judge ordered him to be angry accepted for review filed by the defendant, but rejected the revision filed by the applicant. It said that the order had filed a constitutional application which was arranged for accuracy, resulting in injury and disagreement. Since the DW was not in a position to perform any physical activity with his left arm, an unidentified order under the court failed to consider this aspect of the matter and the medical board could send the injured for examination. There was no attempt. The Magistrate / Trial Court, in its reasonable order based on the evidence contained by the prosecution in the case, correctly concluded that the offense under section 6, 6, was attracted by the PPC, approved in the review. The duplicate impound order was set aside, in which the request for review will be considered pending. The amending court will decide in the light of the medical board report immigration advocate from Head Marala lawyer