Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFAQ versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI

Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application The principles of fair rent were determined by the court below the landlord seeking a consolidation of facts on the basis that the tenant paid him Rs 300 per month as premises rent. While the adjoining properties were taking monthly rent at the rate of Rs 50 per sq ft, the rent controller allowed the application and raised the rent by 10% while the lower appellate court allowed the landlord's appeal. And fixed the rent at Rs 40 per rent. The square foot accuracy provided four conditions in Section 8 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979. And it was not necessary that these four conditions should be satisfied or fulfilled by the landlord while any of the persons mentioned in Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, seeking to fix the rent of the damaged premises. The condition was sufficient to determine the proper rent for the demolished premises. The appellate court had taken into account the evidence that the adjoining property could be found at Rs 40 per square foot, as it would be appropriate to fix the rent on all such aspects. As was already noted, the order sanctioned by the tenant any illegal interference or theft of evidence T was not identified. The appellate court's finding of the two courts to determine the rent was a finding that came after considering all the evidence available on record, under which the courts from time to time arrived in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Can't be Dismissed in circumstances best advocate from Domeli lawyer