Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, the denial of the crime in question was disclosed by the five accused by means of iron bars / sticks, which led to Crow Carrie being charged. Did not hit. On top of that, was the role given only to the co-accused, but the FIR alleged that the accused had struck a lattice / iron rod on other parts of the body of the deceased along with other co-accused. The contents of FIR's contents were proved by the statements of the prosecution witnesses listed under Section 164, CRPC, as well as the accused in the post-mortem report, accused in the case. Might even be involved in the case, it was not the case. One of the further investigations contradicting the whereabouts of the accused was identified by the accused's lawyer, and in this case a deep investigation was required, which was merely a trial matter, as the bail was reached at the conclusion. The evidence for this had to be briefly examined, whether or not the accused could be linked to the crime under question of bail application. family advocate from Nooriabad lawyer