Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DIN versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT NO.1, LAHORE

Section 25 (8) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Scope Bail, Grant despite the ban under Section 25 (8) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the offender on bail during the possibility of his appeal Can release Protecting a person authorized by the court with relief from relief is the subject of the Natural Spirit / Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which is why justice is provided under section 25 (5) above. ? The Appellate Tribunal Act needed to decide the appeal within seven days and thus it was understandable to prevent the appellate authority from being released on bail during the approval of its appeal, but it appears that the legislature did not specify the law. The provisions are ignored. If the appeal is not decided within the said period and has been postponed for many years due to the heavy workload of the court, then what kind of relief can the offender get otherwise he or she can easily get justice done, or short. Unlawful delay in a criminal trial is a misuse of law / court proceedings when convicted or when the offender is suffering from an illness that cannot be cured in a prison hospital. Despite being banned under Section 25 (8) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the accused / offender in the situation can earn the right to seek bail, however, after hearing the appeal, an offender can be convicted. The release does not deprive the High Court of the authority / jurisdiction that the constitution relieves under extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction in the context of Article 199, therefore, its extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction in exceptional cases. Using your A. advocate for immigration from Sargodha lawyer