Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Section 66A and 13 (1) (d) Income Tax Rules, 1981, R207 (a) The Deputy Commissioner's Reviewing Commissioner's Inspection Powers, notice of the assessment officer's termination of the assessment of dissent There was no material to consider that the order to inspect the Additional Commissioner was wrong and prejudicial, as no details were given about the location of the property for which it was alleged. That the Settlement Officer has failed to detect it. Examining the correct amount of value and taxing its profit, the Additional Commissioner failed to mention the location of the property; he had incorrectly requested the provisions of section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 without giving any reason or Without showing any content why they had the order of review wrong and wrong .Naturally it was in the interest of the Revenue to re-examine the behavior of the diagnostic officer except that he did not agree. r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.