versus
Section 66A and 13 (1) (d) Income Tax Rules, 1981, R207 (a) The Deputy Commissioner's Reviewing Commissioner's Inspection Powers, notice of the assessment officer's termination of the assessment of dissent There was no material to consider that the order to inspect the Additional Commissioner was wrong and prejudicial, as no details were given about the location of the property for which it was alleged. That the Settlement Officer has failed to detect it. Examining the correct amount of value and taxing its profit, the Additional Commissioner failed to mention the location of the property; he had incorrectly requested the provisions of section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 without giving any reason or Without showing any content why they had the order of review wrong and wrong .Naturally it was in the interest of the Revenue to re-examine the behavior of the diagnostic officer except that he did not agree. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Shogram lawyer