Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


Section 66A and 13 (1) (d) Income Tax Rules, 1981, R207 (a) The Deputy Commissioner's Reviewing Commissioner's Inspection Powers, notice of the assessment officer's termination of the assessment of dissent There was no material to consider that the order to inspect the Additional Commissioner was wrong and prejudicial, as no details were given about the location of the property for which it was alleged. That the Settlement Officer has failed to detect it. Examining the correct amount of value and taxing its profit, the Additional Commissioner failed to mention the location of the property; he had incorrectly requested the provisions of section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 without giving any reason or Without showing any content why they had the order of review wrong and wrong .Naturally it was in the interest of the Revenue to re-examine the behavior of the diagnostic officer except that he did not agree. r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Shogram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.