Find a Lawyer

versus

Sections 26, 33, 34 and 46 of Central Excise Rules, 1944, RR 3, 6, 22, 23, 26, 47, 52, 52A, 210 and 226 Appellate Tribunal demand for Central Excise Duty Central Visited the premises of the appellant's appellant factory and upon inspection the warehouse appellant lacked stock produced was charged with violation of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and appellant imposed sales tax and fines. ? The stock filing appellate review came into effect when the appellant's detective staff also acknowledged his own written statement recorded with additional duty, along with the demand for Central Excise Duty, However, no stock was kept clean. Beyond the stipulated period, because fresh stock of produce continued to replace old stock under the covenant with the bank demand of the Central Excise Duty and the additional duty on it, the account was deleted, in which case the Central Excise Rules 1944 R210. The penalties imposed under the Act were also removed top advocates from Upper Deval lawyer