MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD MEMON LABOUR
Section 2 (x), (xx x), 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (c) (i) and Section O15 of 15 service complaint. Exhausted, `Workman's retaining emplo- ties with employer and employee appellant respondents, who were dismissed, filed a complaint for the employer's bank against their dismissal lawyer's order. The request is not valid because the defendant did not work as an employee at the bank. On several occasions he was stationed overseas and despite being overseas, he was always under the command and command of the bank, the fact that the defendant was charged and the bank was prosecuted, the parties said. Enough to establish a relationship between employer and employee The respondents took the position that he was a "laborer" and performed manual and academic work otherwise he went to the bank to prove what the burden was. The question in this case is whether the respondent was a `laborer 'or not but the matter was not dealt with by the court. Was given. Employers were hired to find out the fact
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
