Find a Lawyer

RAJA SAFEER AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI

Sections 2 (J) and 3 are reported in Section RO 279 (I) / 2007 National Command Authority Ordinance (LXX of 2007), Section 2 (D) Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), defenses banning the use of the constitutional property of Arts 23, 24 and 1991 were temporarily owned by the applicants at the Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (Pinstick), under which notification to the applicant. Section R 279 (I) / 2007 was agreed. Authorities prevented all property owners from being separated from one place unless allowed by the applicants, provided that the restriction under the Constitution is strictly prohibited and that section 2 (j) of the act. ) Does not fall under the definition of pinstripe defense works described in. Applicants of the Defense Act, 1903, further requested that the authorities could obtain their property under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; there were no restrictions on the limitation imposed for an unlimited period of reasonable sanctions as prescribed in Article 23 of the Constitution. Under this, people had not objected to the construction for the last sixty years, and then a notification was issued so that restrictions were placed all over the place without setting a time limit for keeping the public in turmoil. The indefinite period by the notification for indefinite period was not appropriate sanctions. After the matching of section 35 and the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the High Court directed the officials to propose a fixed period for temporary sanctions. No more than three years from the date of the notification, otherwise the notification will be three years famous lower court advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer