Find a Lawyer

MU.HAMMAD TARIQ AMEEN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, sections 44, 46 and 49 of the application for the right to appeal under section 9 of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Removal (Special Powers)) Appeal, jurisdiction under section 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975 and section 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service (Special Powers) Act, 2001, finalized by a public servant. Under the order, section 4 can be filed against the provision of AJ. And the Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975 became effective from the Azad Jammu and Kashmir under sections 10 and 11 of the Service (Special Powers) Act 2001, it has a lot of impact, a ban on the right to service. As such, the denial shall be equal to section 10. For the purposes of section 2 (a) of the Act 2001, the employee of the court was not provided with the right to appeal to the employee of the court under the Act of 2001. Or by any person authorized by the Articles of Service of the Employees of the Court to the Tribunal under section 4 of the Act of 1975, under Section 4 of the Act 2001 and under section 4 of the Act, will undermine the independence of the judiciary. The Act, 1975, violated Section 49 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, to the extent of employees of the court. The High Court abolished Section 10 of the removal of Azad Jammu and Kashmir from the Service (Special Powers) Act, 2001 and suspended its effect. It was appropriately amended in section 10 up to section 11 and by then the order of the jurisdiction would make the aggrieved public servant entitled to appeal under section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975. The High Court further observed that the court was free ask a advocate free from Kundina lawyer