Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ AHMED versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 9 (b) and 25 bail, further inquiries in question were found in the form of marijuana grant five separate slabs / patties, but only one slab / Petty was sent for chemical analysis report No expert opinion on the remaining four slabs / plates may be available, whether or not they contain any narcotic substances because only one slab / pty is isolated chemical. An analysis was sent for the report, which weighed in. One kilogram, chemical report will be final only to one kilogram of hashish. The question is whether the recovered substance was under the influence of intoxicants, will the appropriate evidence be properly determined at the trial stage once the record is in place? The chemical analysis report shows that only a slab / pet, weighing one kilogram, would be the first to commit a crime under Section 9 (b) narcotic substance control law. 1997, which was punishable by seven years. The incident allegedly took place in the middle of the city, which was a densely populated area, but no private person was included as a witness / advisor to the area under Section 25 control. According to the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, Article 103, the CR PC shall not apply, but each matter still has to be viewed in its true context with respect to the background and the surrounding conditions, in the present case, of the natural conditions. As such, there must be some persons from the area who witnessed the incident, but none of them were related, the accused further investigating under Section 497 (2), CRPC. On demand, he was admitted on bail. best law firms from Naukundi lawyer