Find a Lawyer

SYED MUKHTIAR SHAH versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.VII, SUKKUR

Sections 46 and 48 of the service suspension application were set aside on a temporary assignment to appeal to the High Court of Appeals and their services were inspected approximately three years after the appellant approved the service tribunal's appeal. It was challenged in an appeal before. After the decision was made (PLD 2006 SC 602), under which an appeal was filed before the service tribunal, the appellant gave notice to the employer and the Labor Court before the Labor Court dismissed the complaint on two grounds. Complaint Petition Filed First, the request was premature as the applicant, after the complaint application service, did not wait for 15 days and filed the request before the 15 day period had expired. Secondly, the Supreme Court has set a 90-day deadline to reach the appropriate forum; even after the expiry of 15 days, if the appellant again returns to the Labor Court, he still complains. The Supreme Court will be banned on the petition while the proceedings will be directed to end it. The victims were given 90 days to return to the appropriate forum under the judgment; the limitation provided under section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 was not applicable in view of the Supreme Court decision and the appellant was 90 days. May refer the appropriate court within. For the appellant that the lawyer is only required to file a complaint notice, the appellant was justified in referring the matter to the court within 90 days as his complaint cannot be rejected by the Supreme Court on this technical basis. It was before he approached the court. 15-day labor court famous lower court advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer