Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH MASOOD IQBAL versus AZAD GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Item 2, Columns 6 and 8 [Amendment of Information, dated 59.2003] Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, Section 23 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Roll of Business, 1985 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974) VIII), Sections 46 and 58 Written application by the District and Sessions Judges and Additional District and Sessions Judges, Department of Law framing reinforcement for the Additional Secretaries Act (B19) of the Department of Law on the notification dated 5 2003 It was the job of the Service and General Administration Department to interpret and interpret the rules related to various departments and positions, not the Law of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Judicial Service Rules. , 1999 was required to be formulated under section 58 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act. The 1974 record shows that following the issuance of the unwanted notification amended to the Rules 1999, the Chief Justice's High Court directed reforms there, but no action was taken by the relevant department to dissociate itself from the usual procedure. Was not raised and mandatory rules could not be allowed because it would frustrate the legal rules. Whether the work should be as per the appointment of Additional District and Sessions Judge under Punjab. Judicial Service Rules 1994 was created by civil servants less Judicial Magistrates with 10 years of service employees, 60 percent of the development while 40 percent quota was allocated for the initial recruits, which was made by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Judicial Service Rules, 10 of 1999. The year-long advocates had. The government is accused of blaspheming the principle of equality with Punjab, which the government acknowledged by Azad Jammu and Kashmir, envisaging the independence of the judiciary from appointment by exchange of executive officers. top advocates from Gawadar lawyer