Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMED versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 (c) Evidence From the Chemical Examiner's report, it is not known whether the material recovered from the possession of the accused was cannabis, after such a negative report by the Chemical Examiner, there is no doubt that The material sent to the Chemical Examiner was a lawsuit trial, only irreparable damage to the score in the circumstances The record shows that the marijuana was in the form of sticks, but in the whole evidence anywhere, the number of sticks is mentioned. He was not named about the subordinate staff who complained for the purpose of scrutiny. Were with Even the names of the advisers were not included in the memorandum of arrest, recovery and confiscation of the marijuana car, even though it was taken into custody by the excise inspector, but neither such memo was produced nor was it made. He was presented in evidence. Such circumstances made the prosecutor's story suspicious. The suspected recovery had an impact on a highway in front of Pei, a troll pump in the vicinity of the city, which was the busiest place, but neither the public. None of the individuals was testified for the recovery, nor was anyone agreed to confirm the recovery process, though Section 103, CRPC, which was controlled by him, was deleted. The Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, but will not prevent or ban officers reclaiming such places, which surrounded people to take certain steps / steps to engage privateers in the process. ? The location of the story by the prosecutor is highly regarded and highly unlikely, by any respectable person. lawer from fb area from Okara lawyer