Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (O.P.S.), HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD

Section 25A and 37 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Termination of Section O12 Services Appellant Services terminated Appellant's services as a driver in the House Building Finance Corporation and His court appeal was dismissed. The directive that he be a laborer should take notice of the complaint to the Labor Court appellant and then file a complaint within two months, which the Labor Court rejected on the basis that the appellant should come immediately. Should have The Labor Court said that the Labor Court order was wrong on his face, although the appellant did not approach the Labor Court, he had accepted the complaint notice and a complaint was filed within two months. ? The provisions made in this regard could not prevent the request of his complaint from the time limit; the impedance order was placed in the jurisdiction. The Syed's order was set aside and the matter was settled by the Labor Court. Sent to, with instructions to decide the case with merit. immigration advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer