Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAKA ULLAH versus SECRETARY (CHAIRMAN, RAILWAYS)

Article 199 Office of Delegate Ombudsman (Ombudsman) Order Establishment (Article 1 of 1983), Article 32 Constitution Petition against the Complainant / Applicant's Grant Transferring Civil Service, Accusing Transfer of Federal Transfer, Federal Lodged a complaint before the Ombudsman, which was allowed and the transfer was recommended, before the applicant dismissed such recommendations through the constitutional petition regarding pending pay / allowances and pension benefits. Court orders / recommendations may be reviewed under Article 32 of the Federal Ombudsman's Office. (Ombudsman) Order, 1983, but the Department did not take advantage of such measures and did not explain any such failure. The High Court upheld its constitutional jurisdictional order / recommendation of the Federal Ombudsman. I refused to intervene, merged in the circumstances under the High Court order, which was never attacked before the events leading up to the High Forum or the legal utility of the ruling. Could it have been or was it only after the passage of time that the petitioner's submission to the court had merged and mattered? A, its cancellation was not possible by an executive / administrative measure that had been finalized for all intents and purposes, cannot be disappointed in the manner in which such attempt was made. Also, the proceedings were inadequate in the law and therefore a constitutional application was allowed top advocates from Burewala lawyer