Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus STATE

Article & Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 In a case in which a defendant was granted interim pre-arrest bail by the High Court, ASI was arrested from his house at 1 pm on the same day 30 minutes. And neither does it seem reasonable nor possible to believe that the accused had not notified Section I (appellant) of the arrest at the time the appellant came to arrest him. The appellant should consider the above application properly. The accused, especially when he had also submitted a certificate issued by his lawyer in this regard, was consequently dismissed by ASI's appeal, however, in view of the fact that the sessions court After his pre-arrest bail was rejected by the source, the accused remained absconding for a month and immediately after detaining his presence in the house, the defendant A section I arrested him on the spot so that he could once again comply with the law. Could not run Claimant for 3 months Section III of CEE reduced to 2 months for applicant \ Section I \ r \ n \ r \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Baroute lawyer