NADEEM versus STATE
Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Steel Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (b) Bail, Grant of sale of drug charges by the accused, no evidence was assisted with the prosecution, the name of any potential buyer Was taken or was not arrested at the time of his arrest. The accused was not involved in any other case from the accused. The 560 grams of marijuana recovered from the suspect did not make him a transporter or smuggling smuggler. The accused was in custody for about five months and is not expected near the end of his trial. Was. Further investigation was no longer necessary for further investigation of the crime and no further motive could be pursued with further detention, and the bail was due to the absence of any person on the crime or tampering with the prosecution's evidence. The penalty cannot be stopped. Within the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the CC accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Mansehra lawyer