MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) of the definition of evidence as the complainant's servant must be done by the complainant and his sons at the relevant time when the complainant made unreasonable improvement in the trial. A month after the incident, the accused could not be stained with blood from the open plot and recovery of the witness was not supported, only 21 days after the incident, the recovery of cloth was obtained from the complainant's shop. Was. Thus, they were not trusted and were rejected. The motive for the killing was not attributed solely to the accused and the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and he was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer