Find a Lawyer

HANOOK BABAR MASIH versus STATE

Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (C); 25 and 51 bail; Defendant's denial does not prove that he was involved in a misdemeanor charge due to hostility from a police head constable. Was. 1025 grams of drugs / marijuana was recovered from the possession of the accused, the kilo case of the accused was covered under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997, which could carry the death sentence or life imprisonment or one year imprisonment. Which can extend up to 14 years. In 1997, the sanction of bail for an accused for a felony conviction was banned, even if the death sentence in the case of the accused was not punishable, by section 51 of the Controlling Section 51 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 ( 2) Under the law, the bail was not granted unless the bail was generally approved, unless the court agreed that it was a valid case for the grant of bail. The accused did not proceed to guarantee any other bail. Except maybe the hostility from the police head constable who had already repelled the association of two or more respected men in the neighborhood, Munsh The frequency of cases did not need it because the drug articles Control Act 1997 section 25 application was deleted provisions. 10 103, CR PC All witnesses in this case, even though they were police employees, had no legal sanctity against any police officer nor were they prohibited from becoming a complainant under the law if they committed a crime. If the commission had witnessed In such cases, the accused did not challenge the nature of the recovered substances that he did not possess in the drug court before the trial court or the High Court, when you need a advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer