OBIAQWU EZEKEKE versus STATE
Definition of Evidence of Section 9 (c) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 265. No intoxicant was recovered from the possession of the accused and in the statements made under section 161, no witness of the prosecution had said a word. , Based on the evidence obtained by the prosecution against the accused in connection with the alleged crime of the CCPA Aqua suspect, who was allegedly detained by the co-accused with his investigating agency. Only confessed to his own crime, but even when he was in the custody of such officer, he confessed to the investigating officer even in the guilt of the accused, the evidence was admissible if the co-accused made such statement. To the extent that his evidence was admissible, it had no clear value, unless the Investigation Officer had described the Investigation Officer in court in any case. From the confessional statement of the co-accused made during his detention, no other material was available on the record so that the evidence on the record, for allegedly attaching the accused, shows that there is hardly any prosecution against the accused. There was no chance, nor was there any possibility of conviction of the culprits of the accused under the accused r \ n \ r accused n.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Sakrand lawyer