Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PANAH versus STATE

The definitions of Sections 9 (e) and 9 (b), the lack of evidence of the prosecution did not agree on all material aspects of the case which did not have material contradictions or contradictions and were made by the chemical analyst of the sample of the material recovered. There were reliable tests. Well the positive and the articles were slightly the same with heroin. The concentration of heroin was all powder, therefore, it was not heroin, but some percent was mixed with heroin powder, its percentage was not reported in the experts report. No more concise comments. The exact amount of heroin mixed in the powder can be stated, but certainly the heroin will be over 100 grams, because the total weight of the powder was seven kilograms, but it may not exceed a thousand grams. In this regard, the accused was convicted under Section 9 (e) of the Drug Control Act 1997, and consequently changed to Section 9. (b) his sentence and his sentence, which had already been imprisoned, were reduced. \ r \ n power of attorney advocate Hub Inds Estate lawyer